FREE Class Action Cash Settlement Claims Without Proof Of Purchase [Many Verified Received By Mail]

Important Note: When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Content, pricing, offers and availability are subject to change at any time - more info.

Did you know fellow readers are constantly getting checks from no proof of purchase settlements recently? Get in on the free cash with class action settlements that don’t require any proof of purchase, and if you do have proof of purchase, you can get even more cash in most cases! Keep in mind, there are involved surveys and legal hoops to get these settlements so make sure you have a couple minutes. And make sure you fit within the class guidelines and if you do not qualify for this settlement do NOT file a claim. These are all focused on the United States only.


Advertisement


Here are the currently active class action settlements you can sign up for below with proof and without proof required below:

SquareTrade Protection Plan Underpayments  Class Action Claim Information

SquareTrade will set aside an undisclosed amount in a class action lawsuit to end allegations of underpaying their customers for protection plan claims – covering products like smartphones, TVs and more – due in part to incorrect replacement cost estimates as well as a cap on reimbursements.

Eligibility

Claimants will be divided into 2 classes: The Fast Cash Subclass made up of those who submitted a claim for coverage under a SquareTrade protection plan and whose claim was processed via a Fast Cash payment; and a SKU-cap Subclass of class members who submitted a claim for coverage under a SquareTrade protection plan, resolved the claim with a payment, and were reimbursed but with a sum less than the amount actually owed.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Those who fall under the Fast Cash Subclass must produce documents showing that they paid to replace an eligible product themselves, and show the specified amount exclusive of taxes and fees, at or around the period the class member submitted the claim with SquareTrade.
  • Case Deadline: 02/14/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Shuman, et al. v. SquareTrade Inc., Case No. 3:20-CV-02725-JCS, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Procter & Gamble Benzene Aerosolized Products   Class Action Claim Information

Procter & Gamble (P&G) will set aside a sum of $8 million to resolve allegations that the company’s aerosol products were contaminated with benzene, which is an established carcinogen linked to leukemia. Plaintiffs also stated it should be noted that P&G had to recall some of its aerosolized products in December 2021, as a result of benzene contamination.

Eligibility

Any person who bought Secret, Old Spice, Pantene, Waterl<ss, Aussie, Herbal Essences or Hair Food aerosol antiperspirant, deodorant, body spray, dry shampoo or dry conditioner products between November 4, 2015 and December 31, 2021.

Estimated Amount

Varies. Each person may claim for up to three qualifying products without submitting proof of purchase; for a maximum of $10.50 or vouchers for the products. Claimants who submit proof of purchase are eligible to receive compensation for each product they show proof for. Please note that the value of vouchers should they be issued: Old Spice Hair - $5; Aussie - $6; Old Spice, Secret or Herbal Essences- $7; Pantene or Waterl<ss - $9; and Hair Food - $10.

Proof of Purchase

Not required to receive a max payment of $10.50 or vouchers for up to 3 products. To be reimbursed for all eligible products, claimants should provide a dated receipt or other document which reflects the purchase of one or more eligible P&G products between November 4, 2015 and December 31, 2021.
  • Case Deadline: 01/26/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: In re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation, Case No. 2:22-MD-03025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

Brut + Sure Antiperspirant Benzene Class Action Claim Information

Idelle Labs will have to pay a sum of $3.65 million to end allegations that some Brut and Sure antiperspirant products contain benzene, which is an established carcinogen linked to leukemia, and claims that the companies neglected to disclose the presence of benzene in these antiperspirants.

Eligibility

Any individual who bought one or more of the following products between November 15, 2015 and October 28, 2022: Brut Classic Antiperspirant Aerosol (4-oz), UPC 00827755070085; Brut Classic Antiperspirant Aerosol (6-oz), UPC 000827755070108; Sure Regular Antiperspirant Aerosol (6-oz), UPC 00883484002025; and/ or Sure Unscented Antiperspirant Aerosol (6-oz), UPC 00883484002278

Estimated Amount

Will vary depending on submitting with or without proof of payment.

Proof of Purchase

Without proof of purchase, claimants can file for up to five products per household. If claimants have proof of purchase, they can receive a payment based on the amount they paid for, for each of the eligible products.
  • Case Deadline: 01/12/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Delcid, et al. v. TCP HOT Acquisition LLC, et al., Case No. 21-cv-09569-DLC, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Barlean’s Organic Oils Coconut Oil False Advertising Class Action Claim Information

Barlean’s Organic Oils will set aside a fund of over $1.6 million to end allegations that its coconut oil products were wrongly advertised as being “healthy”. The lawsuit further states that the company misleadingly marketed these coconut oil products as having a positive effect on metabolism, supporting heart health and the immune system, and providing quick energy. Plaintiffs note that the reality is that coconut oil is reportedly connected to stroke and heart disease because of its high saturated fat content.

Eligibility

Anyone who bought Barlean’s Organic Virgin Coconut Oil, 16 to 32 oz or 60 oz; Barlean’s Organic Culinary Coconut Oil, 32 oz or 60 oz; or Barlean’s Organic Butter Flavored Coconut Oil 16 oz or 32 oz; between January 24, 2015 and November 10, 2022.

Estimated Amount

Will vary from $3 to $7 per product, with a maximum 5 units of products per person.

Proof of Purchase

No proof of purchase is required to submit a claim.
  • Case Deadline: 01/19/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Testone, et al. v. Barlean’s Organic Oil LLC, Case No. 3:19-CV-00169-RBM-BGS, in the U.S. District Court of Southern California

Oregon Amazon Wage & Hour  Class Action Claim Information

Online retail giant Amazon has agreed to set aside a fund of $18 million to resolve allegations the company required its Oregon staff to work off the clock during rest and meal periods without pay; as well as allegations the company rounded their time clock entries to reduce the reflected number of hours worked – thus violating Oregon law.

Eligibility

The settlement is divided into two classes: the Rounding Class and the Unpaid Break Class. The Rounding Class comprises of current and former Amazon employees who worked at the DPDI, PDX5, PDX9 and/or UOR1 facilities in Oregon between December 20, 2012 and April 15, 2019, and lost time as a result of Amazon’s rounding practices. This class also contains a penalty subclass of individuals whose employment was terminated between December 20, 2015 and April 15, 2019. The Unpaid Break Class includes all current and former Amazon workers who were employed at an Oregon facility between December 20, 2012 and April 15, 2019, and who had at least one clocked-out break that lasted less than 30 minutes. There is also a subclass for individuals who experienced a short clocked-out break between December 20, 2015 and April 15, 2019.

Estimated Amount

Varies.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 01/13/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Swearingen, et al. v. Amazon.com Services Inc., et al., Case No. 3:19-CV-01156-JR, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Experian Incorrect Residential   Class Action Claim Information

Information Consumer credit reporting company Experian will settle a $22.45 million lawsuit to end allegations it incorrectly reported some consumers’ residential information as high risk or as a non-residential address. The lawsuit states this error was financially harmful to claimants as they were denied credit opportunities as a result.

Eligibility

Claimants will fall under 2 classes: Policy Change Class and Money Class. The Policy Change Class consists of all individuals for whom Experian sent a consumer report to a third party as of September 27, 2017, and where the report contained an incorrect Fraud Shield Indicator (numbers 10, 11, 16 or 17) reflecting that the consumer’s address was either a high risk address or non-residential address. The Money Class comprises of anyone affected by Experian’s Fraud Shield Indicators, and who contacted Experian between July 1, 2018 and July 31, 2021 to ask about about or dispute these indicators of having a non-residential or high-risk address.

Estimated Amount

Each claimant in the Money Class may receive payments of between $300 and $900 (Policy Change claimants will receive no monetary award).

Proof of Purchase

Not required.
  • Case Deadline: 01/30/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Hill-Green, et. al. v. Experian Information Solutions Inc., Case No. 3:19-CV-708, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

San Juan Regional Medical Center Data Breach  Class Action Claim Information

San Juan Regional Medical Center will settle a class action lawsuit to resolve claims that the healthcare provider failed to protect their patients’ personal information from being compromised in a September 2020 data breach.

Eligibility

Any person whose personal or health information was jeopardized in the San Juan Regional Medical Center September 8, 2020 data breach. There is also a subclass made of individuals who were notified by San Juan Regional Medical Center that their personal information was compromised in the data breach.

Estimated Amount

A potential amount of up to $2,500; as well as free credit monitoring services

Proof of Purchase

Claimants that fall under the subclass may be required to provide proof of expenses related to the data breach, which may include receipts, phone bills or bank statements showing purchases made for credit-monitoring services.
  • Case Deadline: 02/08/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Henderson, et al. v. San Juan Regional Medical Center, Case No. D-111-CV-2021-01043, in the 11th Judicial District, County of San Juan, New Mexico

Hibbett Receipt Privacy Violation  Class Action Claim Information

Hibbett/City Gear, a retailer of sports and casual gear and apparel, will put aside $6 million in a class action lawsuit to resolve allegations that company violated a federal law – the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act – which prevents too much credit card information being shared on printed receipts. The law is meant to stop businesses from revealing too much sensitive information such as a credit card’s expiration date or more than five digits of a credit card number.

Eligibility

All U.S. customers who paid using a credit or debit card at any Hibbett, City Gear or Sports Additions store in the States, and who received a printed point-of-sale receipt from the store that revealed more than the last five digits of the payment card number between December 15, 2020 and February 23, 2022.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 02/08/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Cliatt, et al. v. Hibbett Retail Inc., Case No. CV-2022-90008, in the Circuit Court of Barbour County, Alabama

ConAgra Foods False Advertising  Class Action Claim Information

ConAgra Foods will pay a fund of $3 million in a class action lawsuit to end allegations that it falsely advertised some of its Wesson oil products as “natural”, even though Wesson oils are made from genetically modified ingredients (GMOs), according to claims made in the lawsuit. 

Eligibility

Any individual living in one of 11 eligible states who purchased Wesson Vegetable Oil, Wesson Canola Oil, Wesson Corn Oil or Wesson Best Blend in that state of residence for personal, noncommercial use within the following time frames: California - June 28, 2007 to July 1, 2017; Colorado - January 12, 2009 to July 1, 2017; Florida - January 12, 2008 to July 1, 2017; Illinois - January 12, 2007 to July 1, 2017; Indiana - January 12, 2006 to July 1, 2017; Nebraska - January 12, 2008 to July 1, 2017; New York - January 12, 2008 to July 1, 2017; Ohio - January 12, 2010 to July 1, 2017; Oregon - January 12, 2006 to July 1, 2017; South Dakota: January 12, 2006 to July 1, 2017; or Texas: January 12, 2010 to July 1, 2017.

Estimated Amount

Varies.

Proof of Purchase

Not required.
  • Case Deadline: 05/22/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: In re: ConAgra Foods Inc., Case No. CV 11-05379-CJC (AGRx), MDL No. 2291, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Gate Gourmet Off-the-Clock Work   Class Action Claim Information

Gate Gourmet Inc will settle a $3.85 million lawsuit to end allegations the company made staff work off-the-clock, thus violating California labor law. The lawsuit further claims that working off-the-clock meant workers received no benefits associated with their paid work; resulting in having to work without rest or meal breaks, not receiving overtime, and other violations.

Eligibility

Any Gate Gourmet staff in California employed as a non-exempt employee any time between May 4, 2016 and October 3, 2022.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not required.
  • Case Deadline: 01/17/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Mohammed Rahman, et al. v. Gate Gourmet Inc., et al, Case No. 3:20-CV-03047-WHO in the U.S. District Court, Northern District

RCN Telecom Services Misleading Fees  Class Action Claim Information

RCN Telecom Services will resolve a $11.5 million class action lawsuit to end claims that it charged consumers misleading fees that were not properly disclosed at any point during the sign-up process. The lawsuit states RCN Telecom reportedly promised a flat monthly rate for their internet service, only to later charge higher monthly rates with a “Network Access and Maintenance Fee” of $4.37 in addition to the advertised price, without customers being aware of the fee until they were billed.

Eligibility

Any current and former RCN Telecom customers in the United States who were charged a “Network Access and Maintenance Fee” between November 1, 2017 and September 13, 2022, and who paid the fee.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not required.
  • Case Deadline: 01/11/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Grillo, et al. v. RCN Telecom Services, LLC et al., Case No. MER-L-1319-22, in the Superior Court of New Jersey for Mercer County

Georgia Parking Enforcement Unlawful Booting  Class Action Claim Information

A Georgia parking enforcement business faces a $2 million lawsuit for placing “boots” on vehicles as a consequence of parking violations. This comes following a December 2021 Georgia Supreme Court ruling that cars can only be booted in places that have mandates that allow it.

Eligibility

Any person who meets one of the following criteria: 1) Owned or operated a vehicle Secure Parking Enforcement booted in Atlanta or Union City, Georgia anytime from December 21, 2011 to September 20, 2020; 2) Paid Secure Parking Enforcement to remove a boot from a vehicle within Atlanta or Union City anytime from December 21, 2011, to September 20, 2020; 3) Parked a vehicle Secure Parking Enforcement booted in Atlanta or Union City anytime from December 21, 2011 to September 20, 2020.

Estimated Amount

Up to $50.

Proof of Purchase

Claimants should submit any supporting documentation which may include proof of owning or driving a vehicle that was booted by SPE during the specified time periods; statements reflecting payments to have a boot removed by SPE; documentation showing the vehicle was booted in Atlanta, Georgia or Union City, Georgia; and any other documentation showing the booting took place between December 21, 2011, to September 20, 2020.
  • Case Deadline: 02/16/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Liotta, et al. v. Secure Parking Enforcement LLC, Case No. 22EV000598, in the State Court of Fulton County, Georgia

Experior Transport Employee Misclassification  Class Action Claim Information

Experior Transport will settle a $1.5 million lawsuit to end claims the company misclassified truckers as independent contractors instead of employees. The lawsuit states this essentially denied the truckers the right to benefits associated with employee classification, and left them without the guarantee of minimum wages; as well as being denied all owed wages, reimbursement for excessive business expenses and more.

Eligibility

Any person from Illinois or New Jersey who entered into independent contractor agreements with Polmax LLC, doing business as Experior Transport, and who was not classified as an employee.

Estimated Amount

Varies/ a possible minimum of $1,500.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 01/30/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Komorski, et al. v. Polmax Logistics LLC, et al., Case No. 2021-CH-01601, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division

Davaco Data Breach  Class Action Claim Information

Project management firm Davaco will settle a lawsuit of $540,000 to end allegations that the firm failed to protect employees’ data in a June 2021 data breach. The lawsuit notes employee information – including names, Social Security numbers and identification card numbers – was exposed in the breach, and that the privacy of the data being comprimised could have lasting effects on victims.

Eligibility

Any person who was notified that their information may have been affected in the 2021 Davaco data breach.

Estimated Amount

Cash payments of varying amounts and/or free credit monitoring. Basic awards start at $185 or 36 months of free identity theft protection, while some claimants could be eligible for up to $5,000 in reimbursement for extraordinary losses.

Proof of Purchase

Any valid supporting documents reflecting expenses/ losses related to the data breach.
  • Case Deadline: 01/12/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: James, et al. v. DAVACO Inc, et al., Case No. 3:21-CV-02318-M, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

American Airlines Baggage Fees Class Action Claim Information

American Airlines will resolve a $7.5 million class action lawsuit involving allegations that the airline wrongly charged some customers for baggage fees when the plaintiffs had already received messages from the company that they qualified to check bags for free. The airline reportedly promised free checked bags to frequent flyers, first and business-class travelers, and owners of American Airlines credit cards. 

Eligibility

Anyone who traveled American Airlines and was charged to check a bag on or after February 24, 2017, for tickets issued prior to April 9, 2020, and who meets one or both of these requirements: 1) Received email confirmation of the purchase of the air travel which noted passengers could check one or more bags for that trip for at no cost; 2) Was an American Citi or Barclay’s credit card holder which entitled the passenger to check their first bag free, and who was traveling within the States. This criterion includes travelers on international itineraries who were charged to check their first standard bag for the domestic part of the itinerary.

Estimated Amount

100% refund.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 02/22/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Cleary, et al. v. American Airlines Inc, Case No. 4:21-cv-00184-O, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

CommonSpirit Health Uncompensated Work   Class Action Claim Information

CommonSpirit Health has agreed to pay $800,000 in a class action lawsuit to resolve allegations that the organization required nurses to work while on-call without compensation, thus violating the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Nebraska wage regulations. The lawsuit reports that nurses were required to answer calls, as well as being required to receive and reply to emails and texts when on-call. 

Eligibility

Any medical nurses in Nebraska employed at CommonSpirit and/or its predecessors Catholic Health Initiatives, CHI Health and/or Saint Elizabeth Regional Medical Center (SERMC), who were paid an hourly wage and were subject to the on-call practice or policy respecting compensation for working remotely while on an on-call shift, any time from February 6, 2015 to April 11, 2022, at one of the locations named in the settlement. Please also note that there are two subclasses claimants will fall under (see settlement website).

Estimated Amount

$193.

Proof of Purchase

Not required.
  • Case Deadline: 03/06/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Walkinshaw, et al. v. CommonSpirit Health, et al., Case No. 19-CV-03012-BCB-SMB (D. Neb.), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska

Spencer Gifts Data Breach  Class Action Claim Information

Novelty store Spencer Gifts has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit to end allegations it failed to properly prevent a 2021 data breach which left employees’ sensitive information comprimised. The lawsuit further alleges the company was aware that its systems were at risk for a cyber attack.

Eligibility

Any person who was notified that their personal identifying information was compromised in the Spencer Gifts data breach between November 24 and 26, 2021.

Estimated Amount

Varies - up to $500 for ordinary reimbursements and up to three hours of lost time at a rate of $20 per hour; to up to $3,000 for extraordinary expenses. Claimants living in California when they received a settlement notification are eligible to receive an additional $50 payment ( which will contribute towards the $500 limit for ordinary expenses). Claimants are also eligible for two years of free credit monitoring.

Proof of Purchase

Supporting documents may include copies of bank or credit card statements, phone bills reflecting related charges, and copies of receipts.
  • Case Deadline: 01/25/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Gonshorowski v. Spencer Gifts LLC, Case No. ATL-L-000311-22, in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Atlantic County

Storm Water Inspection & Maintenance Services Labor Laws Class Action Claim Information

Storm Water Inspection & Maintenance Services (SWIMS) will set aside a fund of $500,000 to settle a class action and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) lawsuit involving allegations the company violated labor laws. The lawsuits state the company broke laws involving meal periods and rest breaks; and violated laws by failing to pay overtime, minimum wages and proper wages owed upon employment termination.

Eligibility

Any SWIMS employees who worked in California from November 17, 2016 to October 11, 2022 are eligible to claim.

Estimated Amount

Varies.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 01/04/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Puglisi v. SWIMS, Case No. 30-2020-01175159-CU-OE-CXC, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange

Forefront Dermatology Data Breach Class Action Claim Information

Wisconsin-based dermatology clinic Forefront Dermatology has agreed to settle a $3.75 million class action lawsuit to end allegations that the company neglected to properly protect patient and employees’ sensitive information in a 2021 data breach.

Eligibility

Any individual whose personal information was compromised in the Forefront Dermatology data breach of May 2021.

Estimated Amount

Varies. Claimants may be eligible to receive up to $10,000 for documented losses; as well as an additional $125 for up to five hours of lost time at a rate of $25 per hour. Class members have the option to opt out of receiving expense reimbursement and credit monitoring, and may instead receive a cash fund payment. Those who opt into receiving reimbursements could also be eligible for one year of free credit-monitoring services.

Proof of Purchase

Any documents reflecting losses related to the ransomware attack.
  • Case Deadline: 02/08/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: re Forefront Data Breach Litigation, Case No. 1:21-CV-00887-LA, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

Faneuil Data Breach  Class Action Claim Information

Faneuil has agreed to pay an undisclosed amount in a class action settlement which addresses claims it failed to have the correct security measures in place to prevent a August 2021 data breach. The breach allegedly left employee information including names, employment data, Social Security numbers, contact information and more exposed to hackers.

Eligibility

Anyone who received notification that their personal identifying information was potentially compromised by the Faneuil data breach of August 18, 2021.

Estimated Amount

Will vary from up to $500 for ordinary losses including lost time at a rate of $20 per hour for 3 hours, to $5,000 for extraordinary expenses/ losses. Claimants who lived in California at the time of the breach may also collect an additional $50 cash payment. All class members will also be eligible to receive two years of Pango’s Financial Shield identity theft protection.

Proof of Purchase

Any supporting documentation showing out-of-pocket expenses and monetary losses due to the data breach.
  • Case Deadline: 02/01/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Pagan, et al. v. Faneuil Inc, Case No. 3:22-CV-297, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Ameripec Labor Laws    Class Action Claim Information

Beverage-packaging company Ameripec has agreed to settle a $472,500 lawsuit to resolve allegations the company violated California employment law in several ways including failure to pay minimum and overtime wages, neglecting to provide proper meal and rest times, not paying wages in a timely fashion during employment or upon separation of employment, not providing accurate wage statements, and by failing to reimburse business-related expenses.

Eligibility

Claimants fall under 2 classes: 1) Anyone who worked as an Ameripec non-exempt employee in California between August 31, 2016, and May 29, 2019, and 2) A class of PAGA members including all individuals who worked as non-exempt employees of Ameripec between August 31, 2019 and March 1, 2022.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 12/22/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Escobedo v. Ameripec Inc, Case No. 30-2020-01170846-CU-OE-CXC, in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange

The Neptune Society and NCS Marketing Services False Advertising  Class Action Claim Information

The Neptune Society and NCS Marketing Services have agreed to pay a combined fund to resolve allegations that the two companies falsely advertised Neptune Society’s pre-need funeral services and related merchandise.

Eligibility

Eligible claimants will fall into 2 classes: 1) Anyone who purchased a Pre-need Funeral Agreement and a Retail Merchandise Agreement from Neptune or NCS in Florida on or after April 1, 2016, but excluding those who purchased a Pre-need or Retail Merchandise Plan for which a cremation service has been performed, and excluding anyone who entered into irrevocable pre-need contracts with Neptune and NCS; and 2) Any person who purchased a Transportation and Relocation Protection Plan (TRPP) on or after April 1, 2016, but excluding all cases in which the beneficiary of the TRPP has already been cremated or buried.

Estimated Amount

Claimants will receive a full refund of the purchase price paid for the agreements. Any refunds that may have previously been paid will be deducted from this amount.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.

Bank of America Overtime  Class Action Claim Information

Bank of America will put aside $425,000 to settle a class action lawsuit focused on the company’s alleged failure to pay workers overtime. One plaintiff specifically noted working more than 40 hours per week in this role, without receiving overtime for the extra hours at the correct rate of 1.5 times the normal rate of pay as per the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and California law.

Eligibility

Any person who worked as a private banking associate for U.S. Trust/Bank of America Private Bank between August 18, 2020, and August 22, 2022.

Estimated Amount

Varies.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 12/13/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Copeland v. Bank of America, Case No. 50-2022-CA-008037-XXXX-MB, in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County

Caravan Foods Wages Class Action Claim Information

Caravan Foods II, Inc. will pay a fund of $1.25 million in a class action settlement to resolve claims the company violated wage laws by having hourly employees work more than 40 hours a week without paying overtime rates, and by expecting staff to work off the clock by denying the required breaks without compensating for that time. 

Eligibility

All current and former non-exempt hourly employees who worked for Defendant Caravan Foods II in California at any time from April 9, 2017 to June 7, 2022 are eligible to claim. Please note that there is no claim form that needs to be submitted.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 12/15/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Kingsbury v. Caravan Foods II Inc, Case No: RG21096357, in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Alameda.

DirecTV Unethical Fines Class Action Claim Information

DirecTV will settle a $9.4 million class action lawsuit which centers around allegations the company knowingly set up minority-owned small businesses with residential accounts with the intention of later threatening legal action and fining them for using those accounts for their businesses. 

Eligibility

Any business and business owner in the United States who had DirecTV services installed in their commercial establishment, only to be audited by Defendant Signal Auditing Inc. for the setup, and who at any time from August 4, 2012, through to August 23, 2022, was contacted by either Lonstein Law Offices PC or Wayne Lonstein or Julie Cohen Lonstein on behalf of DIRECTV seeking payment of fines for allegedly unauthorized use of DirecTV licensed programming, including NFL Sunday Ticket or any other DirecTV-related programming.

Estimated Amount

Will vary/ $25.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 12/11/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Perez v. DirecTV Group Holdings LLC, et al. Case No. 8:16-cv-01440-JLS-DFM, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

LGCY Power Worker Benefits  Class Action Claim Information

Solar power company LGCY Power will settle a $3.82 lawsuit to put to end claims that it violated California law by misclassifying employees as contractors, and consequently neglecting to give workers their due benefits. The violations reportedly extended to failing to pay workers in a timely fashion, withholding wages, not paying overtime to eligible staff, and failing to pay for rest breaks.

Eligibility

Any person who worked as a door-to-door salesperson, setter, closer or lead generator for LGCY Power between May 23, 2015 and August 5, 2022, whether as an independent contractor or as an employee.

Estimated Amount

Will vary, and exact or approximate amounts currently unavailable.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 01/09/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Green, et al. v. LGCY Power LLC, et al., Case No. 37-2019-00026629-CU-OE-CTL, in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Diego

Howard Law Telemarketing Practises  Class Action Claim Information

Howard Law has agreed to settle a lawsuit with the Bureau of Consumer Protection to end allegations that the firm broke consumer protection law in its telemarketing practices and the methods in which the company sold debt-relief services. The lawsuit states that debt-relief companies that use telemarketing are prohibited from charging fees to customers, or even from requesting to charge fees, before providing services. The lawsuit also further claims Howard Law falsely told customers they would not be charged before services were rendered, even though these customers were charged in this manner.

Eligibility

Any person who enrolled in a debt-relief service in response to Howard Law’s false advertisements; and/ or who paid fees directly or indirectly to Howard Law or through Howard Law Network attorneys before Howard Law altered the terms of at least one of their debts.

Estimated Amount

Varies but should be at least equal to a refund for the amount paid to Howard Law in debt protection service fees before services were provided.

Proof of Purchase

Proof of payment sent to the Howard Law PC, The Williamson Law Firm LLC, or Williamson & Howard LLP is required when filing a claim.
  • Case Deadline: 01/26/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Howard Law, Case No. 8:17-CV-00161 (JLS) (JEMx), in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

InventHelp False Advertising  Class Action Claim Information

Invention Submission Corp will set aside a fund of $3 million in a class action settlement to resolve claims it falsely represented services from InventHelp or Western InventHelp. InventHelp is a service for inventors who want to submit invention ideas and have those ideas reviewed to ascertain if they may be commercialized. However, the lawsuit claims the company did not disclose that they do not have any “reasonable and systematic” procedures in place to ensure their data bank does not include companies that are no longer in operation; and furthermore that InventHelp does not match their clients to the proper companies – those most likely to be interested in the idea submitted.

Eligibility

Any residents in the US who paid for services from Submission Corp. (doing business as InventHelp), or Western Invention Submission Corp. (trading as Western InventHelp), from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2021.

Estimated Amount

Will vary starting from $250.

Proof of Purchase

Claimants will need a notice ID and confirmation code to be able to file a claim, and should contact the settlement administrator if these criteria have not been received.
  • Case Deadline: 01/06/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Austin, et al. v. Invention Submission Corporation, et al., Case No. 2:19-CV-01396, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Calhoun, et al. v. Invention Submission Corporation, et al., Case No. 2:18-CV-01022, in the U.S. Distr

University of Pennsylvania COVID-19 Tuition Fees Refunds  Class Action Claim Information

The University of Pennsylvania will pay $4.5 million in a class action lawsuit relating to insufficient refunds to its students whose in-person classes were canceled during the COVID-19 pandemic, thus resulting in breach-of-contract. 

Eligibility

Students enrolled in any University of Pennsylvania program after March 17, 2020, who were assessed spring 2020 fees and were not enrolled for the spring 2020 semester solely in a program that was meant to be online from when the semester started. Please note that a claim form is not applicable and will not need to be submitted.

Estimated Amount

Pro rata payments of varying amounts.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 12/19/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Asha Smith and Emma Nedley, et al. v. University of Pennsylvania, Civil Action No. 20-2086, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

VGW Malta Ltd Gambling Laws  Class Action Claim Information

VGW Malta Ltd., owner of Chumba Casino and Luckyland Slots, will put aside a fund of $11.75 million to resolve allegations the company violated Kentucky gambling laws by selling virtual coins in Luckyland and Chumba Casino slots, and by not refunding players for losses in games of chance. The lawsuit claims that the company lures players in with its “free to play” virtual coins, then quickly charges players in real currency after the initial play. One plaintiff notes that games of chance are illegal in Kentucky, and that players who lose money at games of chance in the state are entitled to receive their lost money back within a specific timeframe.

Eligibility

Any Kentucky resident who spent $5 or more at Chumba Casino or Luckyland Slots within a 24-hour period between March 17, 2017 and March 17, 2022.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not required.
  • Case Deadline: 03/06/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Armstead v. VGW Malta Ltd, Case No. 2022-CI-00553, in the Henderson County Circuit Court, Commonwealth of Kentucky

Snap Finance Unsolicited Calls  Class Action Claim Information

Snap Finance will pay $5 million to resolve a class action lawsuit regarding allegations the company regularly broke federal law by using an automatic telephone dialing system to call consumers without their consent – thus violating Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The lawsuit further reports that at least one plaintiff received 60 calls or more in a three-month period, this without ever being a customer.

Eligibility

Individuals in the US to whom Snap Finance LLC placed, or caused to be placed, a call directed to a number assigned to a cellular telephone service, but not assigned to a current or former Snap Finance LLC accountholder, and in connection with which Snap Finance LLC used an artificial or prerecorded voice. These calls must fall between September 1, 2019 and June 14, 2022.

Estimated Amount

Will vary from approximately $300 to $1,000, and will depend on and adjust according to the number of claims received.

Proof of Purchase

Not required.
  • Case Deadline: 12/12/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Brandi Wesley v. Snap Finance LLC, Case No. 2:20-cv-00148-RJS-JCB, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah

Iowa Barnstormers Abuse & Misconduct  Class Action Claim Information

The Iowa Barnstormers face a $1.9 million class action lawsuit regarding claims of sexual abuse and misconduct by former coach Greg Stephen. The lawsuit takes on Stephen, team sponsor Adidas, and the tournament organizer Amateur Athletic Union (AAU); and brings allegations of negligence in hiring and supervising Stephen. Stephen specifically has been accused of secretly taking explicit images and videos of over 400 boys, on top of allegations of physically molesting more than 12 boys. The Barnstormers have denied all claims of wrongdoing, but have agreed to the settlement payment.

Eligibility

Any individual affiliated with a Barnstormers Basketball Inc. team while Stephen was involved wth the team, and who was victim to Stephen’s “illicit acts of secretly procuring nude images and/or recordings of minors” between 2005 and April 5, 2018.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 03/23/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: John Doe, and all others similarly situated v. Barnstormers Basketball Inc, Case No. 3:20- CV-5-SHL, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, Davenport Division

Bath Saver Spam Phone Calls  Class Action Claim Information

Bath Saver Inc. and its franchisee Bath Fitter will pay $1.95 million as part of resolving a class action lawsuit over claims the company violated federal law regarding spam phone calls. Bath Saver has been accused of violating the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act with unwanted and unsolicited automated calls. 

Eligibility

Any individual in the U.S. who was contacted by Bath Saver or its affiliates, and who received calls two or more times in a 12-month period on a telephone number registered with the National Do Not Call Registry for more than 30 days without consent.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 01/03/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Miller v. Bath Saver Inc, Case No. 1:21-cv-01072-JPW, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

New London Hospital Data Breach  Class Action Claim Information

New London Hospital agreed to set aside an undisclosed amount in a class action lawsuit settlement to end allegations that it did not properly protect consumer data, including personal information such as names and demographics, in a 2020 data breach.

Eligibility

Individuals who received a notification from New London Hospital about the data breach.

Estimated Amount

Varies from up to $500 for unreimbursed losses to up to $5,000 for extraordinary losses as a result of fraud or identity theft due to the breach.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 01/08/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Tom Steen, et al., v. The New London Hospital Association, Inc., d/b/a New London Hospital and Newport Health Center, Case No. 217-2021-CV00281, in the New Hampshire Merrimack County Superior Court

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers Unsolicited Faxes Class Action Claim Information

Florida-based NFL team The Tampa Bay Buccaneers will pay $19.75 million in a class action lawsuit to end allegations it sent thousands of unsolicited faxes to customers.

Eligibility

Any person who received a fax advertisement from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers between July 14, 2009 and June 9, 2010.

Estimated Amount

Up to $615 and will vary depending on the number of faxes received (capped at 5): $350 for the first fax received, $125 for the second, $90 for the third, $25 for the fourth, and $25 for the fifth fax.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 02/06/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Cin-Q Automobiles, Inc., v. Buccaneers Limited Partnership, Case No. 8:13-cv-01592-AEP, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida Tampa Division

Mosaic Sales Solutions Brand Ambassadors Reimbursement  Class Action Claim Information

Marketing agency Mosaic Sales Solutions will set aside a fund of $148,000 to settle claims it failed to reimburse brand ambassadors for their business expenses; including cellphone and other communications costs, mileage costs and other job related expenses. The lawsuit claims that failing to reimburse ambassadors is a violation of California labor law.

Eligibility

Individuals who worked as brand ambassadors for Mosaic Sales Solutions in California between 08/27/2015 and 06/30/2021.

Estimated Amount

$20.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 12/12/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Coyle v. Mosaic Sales, Case No. 19STCV30088, in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, State of California

Trinity Industries Guardrails  Class Action Claim Information

Trinity Industries will set aside $6 million to end allegations that their ET-Plus guardrail devices were defective and dangerous. The lawsuit claims that these ET-Plus devices have even been linked to fatal car accidents, and further purported that the manufacturer made changes to the ET-Plus guardrails’ design in 2005 without announcing the redesign or getting the required approval for such.

Eligibility

All Missouri counties with populations of 10,000 or more as of 07/01/2014, that have or that have had ET-Plus guardrail end terminal systems with 4-inch-wide feeder shoots installed on county-owned and maintained roadways. Please note that Claim forms were mailed to eligible class members.

Estimated Amount

Counties will receive ET-Plus device replacements for the next six years.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.

  • Case Deadline: 01/09/2023 for claims for the cost of locating ET-Plus devices; 10/10/2023 for claims for previous ET-Plus replacements and 10/09/2028 for replacement ET-Plus devices.
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Jackson County, Missouri v. Trinity Industries Inc, and Trinity Highway Products LLC, Case No. 1516-CV23684, in the Court of Jackson County, Missouri

Amplify Energy Oil Spill Class Action Claim Information

Amplify Energy must put aside a $50 million fund to settle allegations that its Orange County pipeline failed, and resulted in dumping thousands of gallons of oil into the ocean. The lawsuit claims the dump has financially affected fishermen, property owners and tourism companies.

Eligibility

Any person who worked or is working as a fishermen, property owners, as well as tourism companies who were affected by the 2021 pipeline oil spill off the coast of Orange County near Huntington Beach.

Estimated Amount

Varies.

Proof of Purchase

Proof of purchase not required but claimants who received any previous compensation are obligated to report it.
  • Case Deadline: 12/07/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Gutierrez et al. v. Amplify Energy Corp et al., Case No. 21-01628-DOC, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division

Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust  Class Action Claim Information

Several automotive parts manufacturers are alleged to have conspired together to manipulate price hikes and fix the price of vehicle components. This has resulted in a $3.152 million settlement, this settlement being the fifth round of a $1.2 billion auto parts class action settlement regarding the antitrust allegations.

Eligibility

Any person who purchased or leased a new vehicle in the United States between 2002 and 2018, or who paid to replace one or more qualifying vehicle parts.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 01/07/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Re: Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 12-MD-02311, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division

Smashburger False Advertising Class Action Claim Information

Burger chain Smashburger will have to put aside $5.5 million to resolve allegations that the company falsely advertised its hamburgers, namely claiming its Triple Double Burgers contain “double the beef.” The lawsuit claims the Triple Double burgers in fact have the same amount of beef as a single patty split between two.

Eligibility

Any person who bought any of the Smashburger Triple Double hamburgers, Bacon Triple Double hamburgers, French Onion Triple Double hamburgers and/or Pub Triple Double hamburgers between 01/07/2017 and 05/31/2019.

Estimated Amount

A $4 cash payment per product for a maximum payment of up to $20 per household without proof of purchase. Claimants may also choose vouchers in lieu of a cash payment (up to 10 vouchers of $2 cash value each).

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 01/17/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Re: Smashburger IP Holder LLC, et al., Case No. 2:19-CV-00993-JAK-(JEMx), in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Root Insurance Total Loss Payments Sales Tax Class Action Claim Information

Automotive insurance company Root Insurance will set aside almost $1.5 million in a class action lawsuit over claims it did not include sales tax on total loss payments to Missouri policyholders, thus violating the company’s own policy terms.

Eligibility

Missouri residents who are automotive insurance policyholders insured by Root Insurance, and who submitted a total loss physical damage claim between January 5, 2011 and August 4, 2022.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 02/04/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Hess v. Root Insurance Co., Case No. 22CG-CC00005, in the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County, State of Missouri

Toyota + Lexus Fuel Pumps  Class Action Claim Information

Toyota will comply with the terms of a class action settlement to resolve claims of some Toyota and Lexus vehicles being equipped with a defective fuel pump. The automotive giant had previously announced the recall of 2.7 million Lexus and Toyota vehicles in November 2020, citing the defective Denso fuel pump – which in turn caused engine problems – as the reason. Consumers claim they were therefore forced to pay out of pocket for exorbitant engine repairs.

Eligibility

All current and former owners or lessees of specific Toyota and Lexus vehicles affected by the recall or otherwise equipped with Denso fuel pumps. See settlement site for more information.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Documentation of repairs and proof of being denied coverage under warranty by a Toyota dealership
  • Case Deadline: 03/14/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Sharon Cheng, et al. v. Toyota Motor Corp., et al., Case No. :20-cv-00629-WFK-JRC in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

USAA Total Loss Payments Sales Tax  Class Action Claim Information

Insurance company USAA will comply with the terms of a class action settlement to end allegations that it failed to include sales tax in total loss payments to Ohio policyholders, thus causing financial damages to policyholders.

Eligibility

All Ohio USAA policyholders who submitted a total loss claim to United Services Automobile Association, USAA Casualty Insurance Co., USAA General Indemnity Co. and/or Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Co, including those who had CRA coverage and who retained a salvage title. Please note that Class Periods for the USAA settlement vary depending on the insurance company and claim type - please see the settlement site for more information.

Estimated Amount

Varies.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 01/04/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Cavallaro v. United Services Automobile Association, et al., Case No. 1:20-CV-00414-TSB, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division

Christopher’s Dodge Ram Discrimination Class Action Claim Information

Colorado dealership Christopher’s Dodge Ram will pay a $935,000 fund to settle claims of discriminated against female applicants. The lawsuit brings claims of female employees having to work in a hostile environment in which other employees and managers called them crude names and touched them inappropriately. The lawsuit further notes that the dealership also faces allegations of discrimination toward Black and African workers, who had to deal with slurs and being called derogatory names.

Eligibility

Any females who applied for or showed interest in applying for a sales position at Cristopher’s Dodge Ram in Golden, Colorado between January 1st, 2012 and July 14th, 2022 but were not hired or contacted, or any female who applied for a sales job during this time but was instead led into an administrative position after being hired.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 11/24/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chris the Crazy Trader Inc. d/b/a Christopher’s Dodge Ram, Case No. 1:21-cv-02666, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

MediCredit Robocalls  Class Action Claim Information

Medical debt collection company Medicredit must set aside a fund of $1.95 million in a class action lawsuit that will resolve claims it placed unsolicited robocalls. The company’s supposedly poor conduct in this regard has led to numerous complaints and a rating of only one star with the Better Business Bureau.

Eligibility

Any person who received a robocall from Medicredit between December 16, 2017 and July 7, 2022. Please note that calls that qualify for the settlement contain the designation “WD” and an “MC” and/or “MD” notation in Medicredit’s records.

Estimated Amount

Varies.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable
  • Case Deadline: 12/06/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Miles v. Medicredit Inc., Case No. 4:20-cv-1186-JAR, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

LeafFilter Defective Gutter System  Class Action Claim Information

LeafFilter has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit over claims that its gutter system is defective due to how easily leaves, twigs, pollen and other buildup can collect on its gutter filter system. This is also inspite of LeafFilter claiming its system keeps out “all types of debris”. Plaintiffs further argue that water can flow over the top of the gutters and cause damage to the surroundings as a result of the defect.

Eligibility

Anyone who appears in LeafFilter’s customer care database with a debris-related final issue code for their service request between 01/01/2016 and 06/24/2022.

Estimated Amount

Varies. Claimants may receive two cleanings at a rate of up to $100 per cleaning, for a maximum payment of up to $200 if they can provide proof they paid for a debris removal service from their LeafFilter Gutter System multiple times. Claimants who can show payment for one LeafFilter Gutter System cleaning will receive reimbursement for the cleaning at a rate of up to $100 per cleaning, and may also receive two additional vouchers for future LeafFilter Gutter System cleanings.

Proof of Purchase

Proof of payment for a LeafFilter Gutter System cleaning is required.
  • Case Deadline: 02/04/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Zilinsky v. LeafFilter North Settlement, Case No. 20-cv-6229-MHW-KAJ, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division

Ikon Pass Refunds  Class Action Claim Information

Ski and snowboard resort company Ikon Pass has agreed to compensate customers as part of a class action lawsuit settlement surrounding claims it failed to properly refund consumers for their yearly passes after resorts closed due to COVID-19. The lawsuit further reports that, in one case, a plaintiff paid hundreds of dollars for unlimited access which specifically promised “no blackout dates.”

Eligibility

American consumers who purchased an Ikon Pass resort pass or who received a pass as a gift for the 2019/2020 season and used their pass on one or more days before 03/15/2020.

Estimated Amount

Will vary and may include credits of up to $150 which can be used towards the purchase of a 2023/2024 or 2024/2025 Ikon Pass season pass. Some claimants may also be eligible for Lift product vouchers which can be used towards purchasing a single-day lift ticket at any Alterra resort on or before July 31, 2025.

Proof of Purchase

Proof of purchase is required.
  • Case Deadline: 01/02/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Goodrich v. Alterra Mountain Company and Ikon Pass Inc, Case No. 123-45678(PROD), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

Santa Clara County Wrongful Detainment Class Action Claim Information

Santa Clara County Jail, San Jose, California will pay a fund of $2.375 million to end allegations of wrongfully detaining people without prosecuting them, thus violating the 14th Amendment rights of detainees. This violation is a result of reportedly failing to release individuals after 12 hours of not being prosecuted.

Eligibility

Any person who was detained at the Santa Clara County Jail between 26 April 2018 and 26 April 2021, for over 12 hours after the district attorney declined to prosecute them.

Estimated Amount

Will vary from $250 per hour for 12 to 24 hours of detention, and $295 for each hour over 24 hours of detention.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 09/04/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Dylan Camarlinghi v. Santa Clara County, et al., Case No. 21-cv-03020-EJD (LB) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San JosĂ© Division.

Talbert House Data Breach  Class Action Claim Information

Nonprofit organization Talbert House has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit regarding claims of failing to prevent a 2021 data breach. The breach reportedly exposed health information, Social Security numbers, and other sensitive information of clients, employees, partners and third parties.

Eligibility

Anyone whose personal information was potentially affected by the 2021 Talbert House data breach.

Estimated Amount

Will vary from up to $100 for five hours of lost time at a rate of $20 per hour; to up to $4,000 for expenses and monetary losses. Claimants will also receive one to two years of free credit and identity monitoring, depending on what information was compromised.

Proof of Purchase

Claimants should produce receipts, bank statements, and other supporting documents.

  • Case Deadline: 12/19/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Engle v. Talbert House, Case No. A2103650, in the Court of Common Pleas Hamilton County, Ohio

LifeBridge Health Data Breach  Class Action Claim Information

Baltimore-based health system LifeBridge Health will set aside $9.5 million in a class action settlement regarding claims of failing to protect patient information in an ongoing data breach which compromised patient names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, health information and other personal details.

Eligibility

Any person whose personal information was accessed during the LifeBridge data breach which was announced in May 2018.

Estimated Amount

Varies from rates of $20 per hour for up to three hours of lost time plus an additional 2 hours of lost time for extraordinary out-of-pocket expenses, to up to $250 for ordinary losses due to the breach. Those who suffered extraordinary losses may receive up to $5,000.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 02/01/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Johnson, et al. v. LifeBridge Health Inc., Case No. 24-C-18-006801 in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland

Subaru Batteries  Class Action Claim Information

Japanese automotive manufacturer Subaru has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit regarding claims its vehicles can drain batteries faster than anticipated due to their allegedly defective electrical systems. The lawsuit further claims that in spite of being aware of the issue, Subaru did not warn customers of the defect.

Eligibility

Current and former owners and lessees of 2015-2020 Outback, 2015-2020 Forester, 2015-2020 Legacy, 2015-2020 WRX and 2019-2020 Ascent vehicles (please note that this excludes owners and lessees from Alaska or Hawaii).

Estimated Amount

Amounts will vary. All claimants can receive an extended warranty for future qualifying battery failures.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: Estimated to be 03/09/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Subaru Battery Drain Products Liability Litigation, Case No. 1:20-cv-03095-JHR-MJS in the District Court for the District of New Jersey

Avis Budget Electronic Toll Fees Class Action Claim Information

Car rental company Avis Budget Group has put aside a fund of $45 million to resolve allegations of charging renters hidden fees for electronic toll payment services. The lawsuit further claims that these hidden fees are also breach of contract. 

Eligibility

Any person who rented an Avis or Budget vehicle and paid Avis, Budget or HTA an electronic toll processing administrator between April 1st, 2007 and December 31st, 2015.

Estimated Amount

Will vary from an estimated $9.36 for one rental transaction to up to $46.07 for seven rental transactions.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 02/28/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Mendez v. Avis Budget Group Inc. et al., Case No. 2:11-cv-06537-CCC-JSA (D.N.J.) in the District Court for the District of New Jersey

DirecTV Telemarketing  Class Action Claim Information

DirecTV must put aside a fund of $17 million to end allegations that the cable company violated the Telephone Consumer Protect Act with unsolicited telemarketing calls in which they placed pre-recorded marketing phone calls to consumers without consent, typically related to debt owed, even in instances where no debt was owed.

Eligibility

Any person, who as of October 1st, 2004, has received phone calls from DirecTV or from iQor Inc., Credit Management LP, AFNI Inc. or Enhanced Recovery Co. Inc. relating to a debt owed to DirecTV in spite of not being a DirecTV customer.

Estimated Amount

Amounts will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 12/19/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Jenny Brown v. DIRECTV LLC, Case No. 2:13-cv-01170 in the District Court for the Central District of California

Kronos Fingerprint Time Clocks  Class Action Claim Information

Kronos will have to pay in excess of $15 million to resolve a class action lawsuit regarding claims of fingerprint time clock violations according to Illinois privacy laws.

Eligibility

Any person who had to scan their fingers on a Kronos-brand time clock at their workplace in Illinois between January 18th, 2014, and March 20th, 2022. Eligible individuals may have received a notice regarding the settlement in the mail or via email. Those who are uncertain of the make of timekeeping clocks at their workplace can contact the settlement administrator.

Estimated Amount

Amount to be determined and will likely vary.

Proof of Purchase

Does not apply.
  • Case Deadline: 12/06/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Figueroa v. Kronos Inc, Case No. 1:19-CV-01306, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

Magellan Health Data Breach  Class Action Claim Information

Magellan Health has set aside a fund of $1.43 million to resolve a class action lawsuit regarding a data breach from 2019. The phishing attack reportedly left the personal data of thousands of patients exposed. The lawsuit also brings into question how Magellan handled the breach, with plaintiffs claiming the company failed to inform patients that their data had been compromised until November 2019.

Eligibility

Anyone who received a notification that their sensitive personal information or health information may have been left vulnerable in the 2019 Magellan Health data breach.

Estimated Amount

Varies from $225 for ordinary out-of-pocket expenses to $2,500 extraordinary out-of-pocket expenses. Lost time can also be claimed.

Proof of Purchase

Class members should provide copies of receipts or other proof of purchases.
  • Case Deadline: 12/15/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Dearing v. Magellan Health Inc. et al., Case No. CV2020-013648, in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa

Bansley & Kiener Data Breach  Class Action Claim Information

Accounting firm Bansley & Kiener will pay $900,000 in a class action lawsuit to resolve allegations of not effectively handling a 2020 data breach and only informing authorities a year later. It also came to light that information had been taken from the system and shared externally, with customers’ names and Social Security Numbers left exposed as a result of the breach.

Eligibility

Anyone who was notified by Bansley & Kiener that their personal information was possibly compromised in the 2020 data breach.

Estimated Amount

Varies. Claimants may be eligible to receive $1,000 for ordinary out-of-pocket expenses and up to five hours of lost time at a rate of $25 per hour. Some eligible claimants may receive amounts of up to $5,000 for unreimbursed monetary losses resulting from identity theft and/or fraud connected to the case. All members are also eligible to receive one year of identity theft protection services.

Proof of Purchase

Class members should provide copies of receipts or other proof of purchases.
  • Case Deadline: 12/12/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Nelson v. Bansley & Kiener, L.L.P., Case No. 2021CH06274, in the Circuit Court First Judicial Circuit Cook County, Illinois

State Auto Property Structural Insurance Claims  Class Action Claim Information

State Auto Property will payout an undisclosed amount in a settlement to end allegations of underpaying structural insurance claims in certain states, and wrongfully deducting labor depreciation from actual cash value payments; according to plaintiffs.

Eligibility

Claimants are divided into two classes. The first consists of individuals in Mississippi whose homes were insured by State Auto Property and Casualty Co., State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., State Auto Insurance Co. of Ohio, Milbank Insurance Co. or Meridian Security Insurance Co. and who made a structural damage claim for their property between April 2, 2017, and February. 16, 2021. The claim must have ended in an actual cash value less nonmaterial depreciation which caused the payment to be under the applicable deductible. The second class consists of individuals in Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee whose homes were insured by State Auto Property and Casualty Co., State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., State Auto Insurance Co. of Ohio, Milbank Insurance Co. or Meridian Security Insurance Co. and who made a structural damage claim for their property under an insurance policy with a one-year suit limitation between April 2nd, 2019, and February 16, 2021, or an insurance policy with a two-year suit limitation between April 2, 2018, and February 16, 2021.

Estimated Amount

Will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 12/08/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Cedarview Mart, LLC v. State Auto Property & Casualty. Company, No. 3:20-cv-00107-NBB-RP.

T-Mobile Data Breach  Class Action Claim Information

T-Mobile has set aside a fund of $350 million in a class action lawsuit that will help end allegations it failed to properly prevent a data breach that affected 76 million American customers. Even though the breach did not affect financial information, other sensitive details were compromised. 

Eligibility

Any person whose information was compromised in the T-Mobile data breach announced August 16, 2021.

Estimated Amount

Up to $25,000 for out-of-pocket losses. Individuals who choose not to file a claim for lost time or out-of-pocket expenses can receive an alternative payment of $25 or $100 if they lived in California on August 1, 2021.

Proof of Purchase

All supporting documents which reflect how much one lost or spent as a result of the breach (Please note: the specific documentation required for each type of loss is listed on the claim form).
  • Case Deadline: 01/23/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: In re: T-mobile Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, Case No. 4:21-md-03019-BCW, in the Western District of Missouri, Western Division

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles Engine Failure  Class Action Claim Information

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) US LLC will put aside a fund of $8 million to resolve claims that certain Dodge, Jeep, Ram and Fiat vehicles suffer an oil consumption defect which causes engine failure. Plaintiffs argue they were not made sufficiently aware of the problem and had to pay out of pocket to fix engine failure and resulting issues.

Eligibility

Current and former owners and lessees of the following vehicles equipped with a 2.4L Tigershark engine: 2015-2017 Chrysler 200, 2013-2016 Dodge Dart, 2014-2019 Jeep Cherokee manufactured prior to July 2018, 2015-2018 Jeep Renegade, 2017-2018 Jeep Compass, 2015-2018 Ram Promaster City and 2016-2018 Fiat 500x vehicles.

Estimated Amount

Claimants covered under CSN W80 are eligible for a free oil consumption test. If this test shows a significant defect, FCA will replace the vehicle’s engine long block, and claimants will automatically receive a $340 payment.

Proof of Purchase

Supporting documentation which reflects the amount(s) and date(s) of the related expense(s) for which one is seeking reimbursement; as well as the nature of the corresponding Qualifying Repair. Provide any receipts, credit card statements, bank statements showing such.
  • Case Deadline: 03/01/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Amber Wood, et al. v. FCA US LLC, Case No. 5:20-cv-11054 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Avis Budget Car Rental Liability Insurance  Class Action Claim Information

Car rental company Avis Budget Car Rental has agreed to pay a sum of almost $34 million in a class action settlement to end claims it failed to purchase liability insurance as stated in rental contracts. According to plaintiffs, Avis promised to purchase a $1 million supplemental liability insurance policy from ACE American Insurance Co. to cover individuals who are not U.S. citizens and rented vehicles in Florida; but that Avis Budget failed to secure the policy, thus violating the terms of contract and Florida law.

Eligibility

Individuals who rented an Avis or Budget vehicle in Florida between June 12, 2008, and January 1, 2016, and whose rental receipt included these notations: “SLI .00/Day Accepted” or “ALI .00/Day Accepted”.

Estimated Amount

Between $6.51 and $7.46 per rental day based on the number of claims filed.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 01/20/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Heather Venerus, et al. v. Avis Budget Car Rental LLC, et al., Case No. 6:13-cv-921-CEM-GJK, in the U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division

Bricker & Eckler Data Breach  Class Action Claim Information

Bricker & Eckler, an Ohio law firm for a number of healthcare systems in the state, has agreed to a $1.95 million payout to settle claims regarding a 2021 data breach which reportedly left health system patients’ information compromised. The lawsuit states that due to the ransomware attack, hackers accessed and stole client and patient information of over 420,000 people.

Eligibility

Anyone whose personal, medical or financial information was potentially compromised in the Bricker data breach between January 14 and January 31, 2021.

Estimated Amount

Will vary according to losses resulting from the data breach. Claimants may file for up to $5,000 in reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses which may include identity theft protection services, credit monitoring, fraudulent charges and more. Claimants could also receive payments of up to four hours of undocumented lost time due to the data breach at a rate of $20 per hour. Class members may also be able to claim an additional eight hours of documented lost time at $20 per hour.

Proof of Purchase

Any supporting documentation which may include receipts, phone records and other correspondence.
  • Case Deadline: 12/21/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: In re: Southern Ohio Health Systems Data Breach Litigation, Case No. A2101886 in the Court of Common Pleas for Hamilton County, Ohio

Sea Mar Community Health Centers Data Breach  Class Action Claim Information

Sea Mar Community Health Centers will set aside a fund of $4.4 million as part of a class action lawsuit to resolve claims the company failed to properly protect sensitive patient data in a 2020 and 2021 data breach. The lawsuit claims the breach left patients’ Social Security numbers, health insurance information, and other personal details compromised. 

Eligibility

Any person whose personal data was compromised in the Sea Mar Community Health Centers data breach that occurred between December 2020 and March 2021.

Estimated Amount

Will vary. Class members may receive up to $2,500 to reimburse standard expenses in an attempt to remedy consequences of the breach; including identity theft protection costs, professional fees, miscellaneous expenses, and up to 10 hours of lost time at $30 per hour. Eligible class members may receive up to $25,000 for extraordinary expenses or measures needed to attempt to mitigate the effects of the data breach. Class members who did not experience ordinary expenses as a result of the data breach can make a claim for $100.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 12/30/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Jeffrie Allan Summers II v. Sea Mar Community Health Centers, Case No. 2-2-00773-7-SEA in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County

Endo Pharmaceuticals/Impax Laboratories Antitrust  Class Action Claim Information

Impax Labs has agreed to pay $15 million to end allegations of conspiring to suppress generic Opana ER (an opioid pain reliever) alternatives, thus raising the price, resulting in third parties having to pay more than what is considered fair for the brand name drug.

Eligibility

Any individual or entity who purchased, paid for or provided reimbursement for brand or generic Opana ER sold by Endo or Impax between April 2011 and September 2018 in these states: Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia.

Estimated Amount

Exact amounts are unavailable at this time, and will likely vary.

Proof of Purchase

Claimants must show documentation of at least one purchase of brand or generic Opana ER.
  • Case Deadline: 01/05/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: In re Opana ER Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 14-cv-10150, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Connecticut IVF Price Fixing Class Action Claim Information

A number of women’s health providers have agreed to put aside a combined fund of $2.85 million to settle allegations that they schemed to artificially increase the price of in vitro fertilization (IVF) services. The lawsuit claims Women’s Health USA, In Vitro Sciences, CARS and RMACT worked hand in hand to deliberately raise the price of ART services such as IVF. The outcome of this alleged scheme is that consumers were left to pay an unfairly exaggerated price for fertility services.

Eligibility

Any individual or entity who paid, whether in full or in part, for assisted reproductive technology (ART) from the Center for Advanced Reproductive Services (CARS) and Reproductive Medicine Associates of Connecticut (RMACT) between January 1, 2004 and July 19, 2022.

Estimated Amount

Amounts will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 01/04/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Kent et al. v. Women’s Health USA, Inc. et al., Case No. FST-CV-21-6054676-S, in the Superior Court Judicial District of Stamford/Norwalk

Red Robin Stella Artois Serving Sizes  Class Action Claim Information

Burger chain Red Robin will pay $450,000 to settle allegations it sold Stella Artois beer in smaller receptacles than advertised. The class action states that “small” Stella Artois drinks are served in a Stella Artois chalice by Red Robin, but even though the chalice may add to the overall drinking and dining experience, the container doesn’t fit the full “small” size of the beer. This led plaintiffs to believe Red Robin is overcharging for their Stella Artois beers.

Eligibility

Any consumer who purchased a “small” size Stella Artois beer from a Red Robin Gourmet Burger and Brews between June 25, 2017 and July 21, 2022, and who was served the beer in a Stella Artois chalice.

Estimated Amount

Payment amounts will vary, but claimants could expect approximately $3 per purchased beer. Any funds remaining in the settlement after distribution will go back to Red Robin.  

Proof of Purchase

Proof of purchase is not required.
  • Case Deadline: 12/23/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Bruun v. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., Case No. A-20-814178-C, in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada

Genuine Parts Co. & Warren Oil Tractor Hydraulic Fluid  Class Action Claim Information

Genuine Parts Co. and Warren Oil will pay a fund $10.85 million to end allegations that their tractor hydraulic fluid does not meet required specifications. The lawsuit further claims plaintiffs have suffered or could suffer financial losses and damage to tractors and other equipment due to the false advertising of the hydraulic fluid.

Eligibility

Anyone who bought NAPA Quality Tractor Hydraulic & Transmission Fluid, Warren 303 Tractor Fluid, Carquest 303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid, Coastal 303 Tractor Fluid or Lubriguard Tractor Hydraulic and Transmission Oil from July 26, 2014 to present.

Estimated Amount

Approximately $5,200.

Proof of Purchase

Receipts, bucket photographs or other proof of purchase required. Individual purchase claims are capped at $200 unless claimant can provide proof of purchases over $200. Class members may also claim for repairs and must show receipts, invoices, work orders or other supporting documentation which proves work or repairs related to the claim. Class members must support their claim for additional funds owing to to purported equipment losses, repairs and/or parts purchased. Repair payments are capped at $5,000 unless claimants can show documentation of repairs over $5,000.
  • Case Deadline: 02/20/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Yoakum, et al. v. Genuine Parts Company, et al., Case No. 4:19-cv-00718-BP, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri Western Division

Ciox Health Records Fees Class Action Claim Information

Ciox Health will payout $1.85 million in a class action lawsuit to settle allegations it charged unfair fees for providing consumers with electronic copies of their health records, both when requested and when not specifically requested. Texas law limits the fees that can be charged when requesting medical records, and the case claims Ciox Health violated these laws with the excessive amounts consumers were billed.

Eligibility

Individuals and entities who paid disputed fee amounts related to one or more electronic health records requests handled by Ciox Health between September 13, 2015, and July 26, 2022. There are two subclasses of members divided into those who requested electronic records and those who did not specifically request their medical records be delivered in electronic format.

Estimated Amount

Amounts awarded will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 01/27/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Marc Browne, et al. v. Ciox Health LLC, Case No. 4:19-cv-00667 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division

Anheuser-Busch False Advertising  Class Action Claim Information

Anheuser-Busch agreed to set aside an undisclosed amount in a settlement that will resolve claims its Ritas products do not really contain tequila or wine, and are simply flavored beers.

Eligibility

All consumers who purchased any Ritas products including margarita, spritzers and others between January 1, 2018, and July 19, 2022. A full list of eligible products can be found on the settlement website.

Estimated Amount

$9.75 per household without proof of purchase and a maximum benefit of up to $21.25 per household with proof of purchase.

Proof of Purchase

Not required, however proof of purchase is required to receive the maximum benefit.
  • Case Deadline: 12/16/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Browning, et al., v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-00889-SRB, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri

Eagle Road Oil Oklahoma Earthquakes  Class Action Claim Information

Eagle Road Oil will set aside $850,000 in a class action lawsuit to settle claims its wastewater disposal wells resulted in man-made earthquakes in Oklahoma which caused serious damage to properties. Eagle Road Oil has not admitted to any wrongdoing.

Eligibility

Individuals and entities who have properties they own in Oklahoma as of November 15, 2014, and whose properties were damaged as a result of the Pawnee Earthquake on September 3, 2016, and/or the Cushing Earthquake on November 6, 2016.

Estimated Amount

Varies depending on the zone claimant in classed in.

Proof of Purchase

Any documentation that reflects damages suffered.
  • Case Deadline: 12/29/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Name: Adams v. Eagle Road, et al., Case No. CI-2016-00078, in the District Court of Pawnee County, State of Oklahoma

The Office of Personnel Management & Peraton Data Breach Class Action Claim Information

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and its contractor Peraton must set aside a $63 million fund to resolve claims of compromising the personal information of then-current and former federal government employees and contractors, and some individuals who were applicants for federal employment. The lawsuit claims affected individuals suffered losses in connection to the Office of Personnel Management’s 2014 and 2015 cyber attacks or Peraton’s 2013 and 2014 cyber attacks. Both parties deny any wrongdoing.

Eligibility

Anyone who was affected by the Office of Personnel Management’s 2014 and 2015 cyber attacks or Peraton’s 2013 and 2014 cyber attacks and who, after May 7, 2014, suffered an out-of-pocket expense or lost compensable time due to the following reasons: having to purchase a credit monitoring product, credit or identity theft protection product, or other such product or services in relation to the data breaches; having to access, freeze or unfreeze a credit report; or suffered a loss as the result of an identity theft incident or in an attempt to mitigate an incident of identity theft.

Estimated Amount

Eligible claimants may receive up to $10,000.  

Proof of Purchase

Any documents reflecting expenses related to the data breach which may include receipts, invoices and other proof.
  • Case Deadline: 12/23/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation, Case No. 15-1394 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Ford Canada Antitrust  Class Action Claim Information

Ford Canada will set aside a $82 million fund for an antitrust settlement to straighten out claims it worked with other automotive companies to stop vehicles being exported from Canada to the United States. The result, according to the lawsuit, was reduced competition in the U.S. which in turn forced Californians to overpay for their vehicles.

Eligibility

Any individual who has lived in California as of November 15, 2010 and who purchased or leased specific vehicles from a dealer in California between January 1, 2001, and April 30, 2003. The eligible vehicles include: Acura, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Dodge, Ford, GMC, Honda, Hummer, Infiniti, Jaguar, Jeep, Land Rover, Lexus, Lincoln, Mazda, Mercury, Nissan, Oldsmobile, Plymouth, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn, Toyota and Volvo.

Estimated Amount

Potential amounts may vary.  

Proof of Purchase

Documentation is not required when submitting a claim for the time being, though proof of purchase of an eligible vehicle may be requested at a later stage.
  • Case Deadline: 12/31/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Automobile Antitrust Cases I and II, JCCP Nos. 4298 and 4303, in the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco

Ocala, Florida Illegal Fire Service Fees  Class Action Claim Information

The city of Ocala, Florida will set aside a $79 million common fund as the result of a court ruling which alleges the city charged residents illegal fire service fees to counteract the costs of operating the fire department. The claim further alleges that these service fees were actually illegal taxes.

Eligibility

All in-city utility customers who paid the city of Ocala’s fire service fee between February 20, 2010, and July 21, 2020 are eligible to claim.

Estimated Amount

Potential rewards will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Proof of purchase not applicable.
  • Case Deadline: 07/01/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Discount Sleep of Ocala, LLC d/b/a Mattress Warehouse v. City of Ocala, Florida, Case No. 2014 CA 000426, in the Circuit Court of the 5th Judicial Circuit in and for Marion County, Florida

DSL Extreme False Advertising Class Action Claim Information

Telecom Evolutions LLC and Quality Speaks LLC, collectively known as DSL Extreme, have agreed to resolve claims of false advertising in a class action lawsuit. The claim alleges that the companies broke California law by falsely marketing their DSL Extreme TrueSTREAM internet services as “fiber optic.”

Eligibility

Eligible customers must meet the following requirements: - Purchased at least one of four TrueSTREAM internet services packages between March 1, 2015, and July 14, 2017; including 7I 68 kb, 1.5 mb, 3.0 mb or 6.0 mb packages. - Had a standard copper-based phone line with AT&T for the duration of the time the TrueSTREAM service was active, or lived in an area serviced by the ADSL1 during this period - And lived in one of the following eligible area codes during the period and had a phone line which corresponds to the area code: 213; 310; 323; 408; 415; 424; 442; 510; 562; 619; 626; 628; 650; 657; 661; 669; 707; 714; 747; 805; 818; 831; 858; 909; 925; 949; or 951.

Estimated Amount

Varies from $5 to $13 per month for each month the TrueSTREAM service was active until May 27, 2022.

Proof of Purchase

None required.
  • Case Deadline: 12/21/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Chinitz v. Telecom Evolutions, LLC, Case No. 18STCV08068, in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

Monsanto Water Contamination Class Action Claim Information

Monsanto will have to set aside $550 million in a class action lawsuit to settle allegations it contaminated waterways with man-made chemicals called PCBs, thus also contaminating the water systems used by various cities. Affected cities including Los Angeles, Oakland, San Diego and San Jose in California; Spokane and Tacoma in Washington; Portland, Oregon; and Baltimore in Maryland have all taken legal action against Monsanto.

Eligibility

Those eligible include residents of NPDES Phase I and II cities, towns, villages, boroughs, townships and independent port districts within a HUC 12 Watershed adjoining a 303(d) water body impaired by polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as of June 24, 2020.

Estimated Amount

The potential amount claimants may receive will vary.  

Proof of Purchase

None required.
  • Case Deadline: 12/17/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: City of Long Beach v. Monsanto Co., Case No. 2:16-CV-03493-FMO-AS, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Western Division

Pets Global Inc. Zignature Pet Food Mislabeling  Class Action Claim Information

Pets Global Inc. will set aside almost $2 million to resolve claims that some of its Zignature brand pet food products were falsely labeled as “grain free” or “chicken free.” 

Eligibility

Anyone who purchased one or more of the alleged mislabeled Zignature pet food products marketed as “grain free” or “chicken free” between June 2nd, 2017, and June 24th, 2022. Qualifying products include specific flavors of Zignature Dry Dog Foods, Zignature Small Bites, Zignature Canned Dog Foods, Zssential Zignature Select Cuts, and Zignature Ziggy Bar Treat for Dogs.

Estimated Amount

Potential rewards of $5 - $10.

Proof of Purchase

None required.
  • Case Deadline: 12/21/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Gifford et al., v. Pets Global Inc., Case No. 2:21-CV-02136-CJC-MRW in the United States District Court for the Central District of California

Koch Broiler Chickens Grow-Out Services Class Action Claim Information

Koch will pay $15.5 million to settle claims it violated antitrust laws to lessen what their broiler chicken growers got paid.

Eligibility

Consumers or corporations who were paid by Koch as well as other antitrust defendants and/or purported accomplices for broiler chickens grow-out services between January 27th, 2013 and December 31st, 2019. Defendants include: Tyson, Pilgrim’s Pride, Perdue Foods, Koch and Sanderson Farms. Alleged co-conspirators are Agri Stats, Foster Farms, Mountaire Farms, Wayne Farms, George’s, Peco Foods, House of Raeford Farms, Simmons Foods, Keystone Foods Fieldale Farms, O.K. Industries, Case Foods, Marshall Durbin Companies, Amick Farms, Mar-Jac Poultry, Harrison Poultry, Claxton Poultry Farms and Norman W. Fries.

Estimated Amount

Potential awards will vary.

Proof of Purchase

Supporting documentation including settlement sheets for the Broiler flocks raised, year-end accounting statements provided by an Integrator and other eligible proof.

  • Case Deadline: 2/6/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: In re Broiler Chicken Grower Antitrust Litigation No. II, Case No. 6:20-md-02977-RJS-CMR, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma

Hawaiian Home Lands Trust Claims Office Closure Class Action Claim Information

The state of Hawaii has agreed to settle a $328 million class action claim to resolve allegations that it wrongfully eliminated the Hawaiian Claims Office and mismanaged the trust.

Eligibility

Any person who filed claims with the Hawaiian Home Lands Trust Individual Claims Review Panel before August 31st, 1995 will be eligible to claim, even if the panel dismissed their particular claim.

Estimated Amount

Yet to be determined and may vary.

Proof of Purchase

No course of action or proof of purchase is required to benefit from the settlement. However, individuals or surviving family members should ensure that contact details and mailing addresses are up to date, and can do so on the settlement website.
  • Case Deadline: 12/15/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Kalima et al. v State of Hawai’i et al., Civil No. 99—4771-12 LWC, in the First Circuit Court, State of Hawai’i

Office of Personnel Management Data Breach Class Action Claim Information

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and its contractor Peraton will set aside $63 million to settle a class action lawsuit which claims OPM and Peraton are responsible for a data breach which compromised personal information of federal government employees and contractors, and those who applied for federal employment. OPM and Peraton deny any wrongdoing. 

Eligibility

Any consumers who suffered losses due to the OPM 2014 and 2015 cyber attacks/ data breaches or Peraton’s 2013 and 2014 cyber attacks/ data breaches; and whose personal information was compromised, and who - as a result of the data breach - suffered an out-of-pocket expense or lost compensable time in the following way(s): (1) had to purchase a credit monitoring product, credit or identity theft protection product; (2) had to access, freeze or unfreeze a credit report with a credit reporting agency; or (3) as a result of an identity theft incident or to allay an incident of identity theft.

Estimated Amount

Varies - a maximum claim of $10,000 may be awarded.

Proof of Purchase

Proof must support your claim including documentation of expenses related to the data breach, receipts, invoices and other valid proof.
  • Case Deadline: 12/23/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation, Case No. 15-1394 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

RailWorks Data Breach   Class Action Claim Information

RailWorks has come to an agreement, to settle a class action suit, in which former and current employees will receive identity theft protection and up to $50 in reimbursement for lost time following a 2020 RailWorks data breach. RailWorks is accused of failing to protect current and former employees’ personal records, as well as that of their beneficiaries and dependents, and vendors who received a form 1099 from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), during a January 14th, 2020 cyberattack. RailWorks denies any wrongdoing.

Eligibility

Any person who is a citizen or resident of the United States and is an employee, former employee, beneficiary, or dependent of an employee or former employee, or a vendor of RailWorks that received IRS Form 1099, and whose personal records wre affected by the data breach in question.

Estimated Amount

RailWorks will offer and pay for credit monitoring and identity theft protection through April 1, 2023. Claimants may also receive up to $50 for reimbursement for lost time related to identity theft directly caused by the RailWorks data breach.

Proof of Purchase

Those wanting to file for lost time must submit a claim form with supporting documentation for up to five hours at a rate of $10 per hour, for a maximum of $50. Receipts, phone records, bank statements, or other documents showing the amount of time spent should be included. If filing on behalf of a claimant; you must include documentation such as proof of authority, a death certificate, or other eligible documentation.
  • Case Deadline: 60 days after the date the Class Member last expended time, but no later than 04/01/2023.
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Coleman v. RailWorks Corp., Case No. 1:20-cv-02428-GBD (OTW) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Allura Fiber Cement Siding  Class Action Claim Information

Allura will be setting aside $12.5 million to a settle a class action regarding their fiber cement siding, which is allegedly defective and prone to problems such as cracking, bowing, shrinking, and breaking.

Eligibility

The reward would benefit anyone who owns a home that has Allura fiber cement siding manufactured in Plycem’s White City, Oregon, plant between February 1st, 2014, and May 7th, 2014, or manufactured at the company’s Roaring River, North Carolina, plant between February 1, 2014, and February 18th, 2015.

Estimated Amount

The estimated amount varies depending on claim filed: replacement and repair, a quick cash option, or a cash option with proof of repair. Replace and repair: $1 per square foot toward the cost of primed fiber cement boards equal to the size of the replacement area; $4.75 per square foot of replacement area to contribute to additional repair costs, including installation labor, paint, home wrap, trim, and all other repairs and/or incidental work; an additional $200 if the total replacement area is 20 boards or fewer; and a paint allowance of $1 per square foot for the entire elevation where the replacement area is less than 30 percent of the elevation. Claimants filing for quick cash option will receive $4.25 per square foot of qualifying damage. Class Members may choose the cash option with proof of repair only if the qualifying damage does not exceed 30 percent of an elevation. The claimant will receive $4.25 per square foot of qualifying damage within 30 days of final approval. If claimants then provide sufficient proof of repair for the entire elevation within the allotted time, they will be eligible to receive $4.25 per square foot of the remaining portions of the elevation.

Proof of Purchase

Proof of ownership is required, along with specific documentations.
  • Case Deadline: 06/23/2023
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: Case Name: In Re: Allura Fiber Cement Siding Products Liability Litigation, Case No. 2:19-MN-2886-DCN in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina

Fairlife Cow Mistreatment  Class Action Claim Information

Fairlife, their parent company Coca-Cola, and others have agreed to settle a $ 21 million class action suit over claims that their milk cows are abused. This is contrary to advertised claims that the milk comes from dairy cows that are treated humanely and with care. The claim also covers the fact that consumers would not have paid Fairlife’s and Fair Oak Farms’s higher prices had they known that the animals were being mistreated. 

Eligibility

Any consumer who purchased Fairlife or Fair Oak Farms dairy products on or before April 27, 2022; including milk, ice cream, butter, yogurt and other eligible dairy products from Fairlife and Fair Oak Farms.

Estimated Amount

You can claim an award of $20 without purchase, and additional maximum $80 with proof of purchase including receipts, physical packaging or other records. This means there is a maximum possible award of $100 (claims with purchase + a claim without purchase). This amount may vary depending on the proof you submit and how many claims you file with proof.

Proof of Purchase

A receipt needs to be presented to receive the maximum possible award of $100, but no proof of purchase is required to claim for $20.
  • Case Deadline: 12/27/2022
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: In re fairlife Milk Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, MDL No. 2909, Lead Case No. 1:19-cv-03924-RMD-MDW, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Equifax Data Breach Class Action Claim Information

Equifax has agreed to dedicate at least $380.5 million to settle a class action lawsuit regarding its 2017 data breach which affected an estimated 147 million people.

Eligibility

Anyone of the estimated 147 million individuals affected by the September 2017 Equifax data breach are eligible to claim.

Estimated Amount

Potential rewards include $125 cash payment or free credit monitoring through Experian, offered for at least four years and one bureau credit monitoring offered for an additional six years. Cash payments are available for Class Members who have credit monitoring services that will continue for at least six months. Another potential reward includes up to $20,000 in reimbursement for expenses, with time spent recovering from the fraud (up to 20 hours at $25 per hour), out-of-pocket expenses, and the cost of credit monitoring. Compensation may also include free identity restoration services for at least seven years.

Proof of Purchase

Not applicable as this was not a purchase but many are eligible.

  • Case Deadline: 1/22/2020 for initial claims and 1/22/2024 for extended claims
  • Class Action FAQ: Visit Case FAQ
  • Case Name: In re: Equifax Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, Case No. 1:17-md-2800-TWT, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

What is a Class Action Lawsuit?

Also known as a representative action.

A class-action lawsuit is a lawsuit filed by members of the same class. It is initiated by a group of people who believe they have suffered a similar injury instead of individual lawsuits brought on behalf of one person’s interests. An example of a class action is a securities fraud class action. In this case, investors sued the entity that issued the security and led them to believe it was safe.

Class actions are unique in that they are brought by a named plaintiff on behalf of the class instead of an individual lawsuit. The named plaintiff has to have suffered the same type of injury as everyone else in the class and must file a claim on behalf of everyone in the class.

How Long Does a Class Action Take?

A class action can take months or years to settle, with some lasting over 20 years. Several factors contribute to the length of a lawsuit. First, each person must opt-in or consent to be included in the class action. If they do not, they will be considered as a party not involved in the suit and will likely be sent a notice of the settlement agreement if one is reached.

Next, an actual trial component can take months or years. Sometimes, a settlement is reached, and a trial is avoided. This means that the judge does not need to pass down a verdict, which can shorten the time of the case.

Finally, attorneys for each side must agree on how much money to distribute to the beneficiaries of the lawsuit. This requires negotiations between their respective legal teams. If a settlement is agreed upon, the funds are distributed to those who have opted into the class.

However, if no settlement occurs, the case is heard in court, and there is a verdict that the judge must reach. The trial process can take years and can become expensive for everyone involved, including the defendants and plaintiffs.

How do Class Actions work?

In a lawsuit class action, the named plaintiff brings suit on behalf of multiple people who have suffered similar injuries. The plaintiffs are often the people who have been wounded, but there can also be others who are not directly injured. An attorney usually brings the case on behalf of the class. As a result, there is a lot at stake in the case results, so it takes longer than an individual lawsuit.

In a class-action lawsuit involving securities fraud, plaintiffs sued the company that issued security because they believe it misled investors about its financial health. This type of securities fraud is a class action, as the plaintiffs seek damages on behalf of the people they represent: those who initially invested in the company. Since it is a class action, everyone who bought stock in that company at any time will be included.

The company may also settle with its shareholders before or during the trial. In this case, settlement proceeds go to all shareholders who have opted into the settlement. The settlement agreement will require the company to pay up, and a judge must decide how much to award in the settlement.

What Happens When a Lawsuit Settles?

When a lawsuit settles, the court has agreed on how much money each plaintiff is entitled to receive. They then decide how much money should be distributed and whether or not it will be paid directly or through an escrow account. Once this has occurred, the funds are distributed to each claimant as agreed upon by the judge and attorneys for both sides.

Settlements can take months or years before happening. They can also involve negotiations between the parties for the size of the settlement and how it will be distributed to each claimant.

How do you join a Class Action Lawsuit?

Suppose you believe that you have suffered a loss or harm from the products of a corporation or a business, discriminatory practices, or because of an environmental hazard. In that case, there is an option available to you. It is called opting into a class-action lawsuit, known as “joinder” or “joinder by and through.” In order to join the class, you will need to fill out the reservation of claim form and sign under penalty of perjury that the information is valid. The reservation of claim form is legal, so it must be completed and signed by an attorney who knows about the class action lawsuit and has been authorized by each party to represent you in a case against the other side. You must complete the reservation process in advance of any settlement agreement. If one is not reached, you will lose your seat as part of a class-action lawsuit.

You have the right to join a class-action lawsuit.

Advantages of joining a Class Action Lawsuit

There are several benefits to joining a class action lawsuit if you are entitled to participate:

1. You do not have to become involved in the lengthy process before a trial. You will receive compensation for all your lawyer’s expenses and those of the other plaintiffs.

2. You will be part of a much larger group of people who have suffered similar losses as you, meaning that you may receive more money than if you had filed an individual suit.

3. The settlement is final. Once a settlement has been reached, no one can change it. Therefore, you will receive all the money that you are entitled to receive.

4. It saves costs and time. You may still receive compensation even if the class action is not decided in your favor, the lawsuit will impose no monetary obligations or damages on your assets, and the settlement will be final.

5. If a settlement is reached, it will be much easier to receive your portion of the damages.

Drawbacks

There are some disadvantages to joining a class-action lawsuit. These include:

1. You must have suffered a loss due to the class action. Therefore, you will not receive any payments if you have not suffered financial or physical losses.

2. You must be able to prove that you suffered damages to receive payment under the terms of the lawsuit. You can prove a loss by showing that you have suffered an injury or lost money because of the people in the class action.

3. You will have to wait until a class action lawsuit has been filed before you can join. Therefore, if there is a settlement, you will not be entitled to the money unless you join the class action lawsuit. Look for a qualified attorney or law firm to help you through this process.

4. You will not receive any payment if the class action lawsuit is decided in your favor. However, if this happens, you may still receive compensation as part of a separate settlement agreement in another case between the parties involved with the litigation.

5. You may be required to participate in future lawsuits. If this is true, you will be entitled to a settlement and any other amounts that may arise from the class action lawsuit.

6. You must give up your right to a trial or an individual suit if you join a class-action lawsuit.

7. You must sign a waiver releasing the lawyers involved with the lawsuit from any possible liability for damages, except those directly caused by their negligence or misconduct.

8. There is no guarantee that a class action lawsuit will be successful. The case may take years to go through the court system, and you may not receive all the money promised for being part of the suit.

9. You need to hire an attorney to represent you in the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers will offer a contingency basis, which means they will only be paid if you win your claim; however, some do not offer this option, and you must pay for their services.

Final Considerations: Class Action Lawsuit Lawyer

When you are considering a class-action lawsuit, you want to ensure that you have all the information about the case before deciding on joining it or not. The following tips will help you get the information that you need.

1. Research the attorney representing the other side of your class action lawsuit and find out what kind of reputation they have in your state and with people who have sued them before.

2. Find out if the attorney and their law firm are class action lawyers, meaning that they specialize in class action lawsuits.

3. Check if the attorney or law firm has any history of filing or losing class action lawsuits.

4. Find out what kind of experience they have handling class action cases and how long they have been practicing law.

5. Do some research on the judge and make sure they have experience handling class action lawsuits if your case goes that far.

6. Find out what percentage of the settlement you are entitled to and how much time you will have to opt-in before the remainder of the settlement agreement is finalized.


Class actions have become a common practice in U.S. courts. You may have a chance to recover damages in class actions if you or your loved one has been victimized by corporate wrongdoings like fraud and misconduct, hazardous products and environmental hazards, discrimination, or other violations of civil rights. The benefits of a class-action lawsuit are numerous.

These are just some of the differences between an individual and a class-action lawsuit. It can be challenging to know whether you should opt-in or file an individual suit. It would be best if you talked to an experienced attorney familiar with class actions. A qualified attorney can explain your options and help you decide if filing a suit is best for you.

Class Actions FAQs

What happens to the money that’s left after a settlement deadline has passed?

The money will go to the attorneys for the plaintiff and their lawyer. It will be divided between the lawyers accordingly. The attorneys can choose to keep it all or share it with their clients.

Are class action lawsuits taxable?

Some class action settlements include a portion of the settlement that is non-taxable. But if this occurs, it’s usually a small percentage of the total payout.

How to tell if a class action notice is legit?

To be considered a legitimate class action notice, it must be sent by someone with authority to do so. The mailer should include the name and address of the class action lawyer. The notice should say that you may be eligible to join the lawsuit and include a detailed description of how you were harmed.

Is it bad to join a class action?

No, joining a class action is not bad. It can be good because you don’t have to stress about filing a lawsuit yourself, and you won’t have to hire your own lawyer to do so.

Do you have to pay for a class action settlement?

It depends on the terms of the settlement. Many settlements involve a percentage of the money that’s left as payment. There are also some instances where you won’t have to pay anything.

What if your class action settlement doesn’t cover your case?

If you don’t want to participate in the class-action lawsuit but still want to get some money from the responsible party, you can negotiate a separate deal outside of the class-action lawsuit.

Can I join more than one class-action lawsuit?

Yes. If you are eligible for more than one class-action lawsuit, it may be recommended, especially with similar causes of action or circumstances.

How many people do you need for a class-action lawsuit?

There is no specific number of people who must be involved in a class-action lawsuit. However, the more class members involved, the better it will be for your case. Also, too few people may lead to the court’s failure to certify the lawsuit.

Should I know about class action lawsuits?

If you have been victimized by misconduct by a corporation or other business that harmed you in some way, you may want to consider joining a class-action lawsuit. It’s also a good idea if you were hurt and had no idea how to proceed with an individual lawsuit against the responsible party.

Note: Yo! Free Samples does not process claims, we cannot advise you on any class action settlement claim, we are not a law firm or settlement administrator. This blog post solely reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. This content is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as legal, business, investment, or tax advice. You should consult your own legal or other advisers as to those matters.

FREE Class Action Cash Settlement Claims Without Proof Of Purchase [Many Verified Received By Mail]

Keep Browsing



Subscribe To Our Daily Deals & Freebies Email:

What to expect: Emails around noon EST, 7 days a week with the latest free stuff, deals & sweepstakes daily. You can unsubscribe at any time.


Home » Free Samples Without Surveys By Mail » FREE Class Action Cash Settlement Claims Without Proof Of Purchase [Many Verified Received By Mail]